Lawmakers returned to the floor Monday for a second extended week of debate over the proposed Electoral Reform Bill, with negotiators from both major coalitions signaling openness to a revised timeline for implementation.

The bill's central provisions — updated voter-verification steps and a standardized grievance process for local election offices — have drawn cautious support from state election commissions, though several regional parties have pressed for a longer transition period before the new procedures take effect.

"We are not opposed to reform," said one state party spokesperson familiar with the negotiations. "We are opposed to reform on a timeline that leaves local offices unprepared."

"We are not opposed to reform. We are opposed to reform on a timeline that leaves local offices unprepared."

Committee staff have circulated a revised draft that would phase in the verification requirements over eighteen months rather than six, a compromise that appears to have softened opposition from at least two regional blocs. A final committee vote is expected before the session's scheduled close later this month.

Observers note that the outcome will likely shape how the bill is received ahead of next year's state elections, when the new procedures would first be tested at scale.